您好,登錄后才能下訂單哦!
能力有限有誤請諒解,源碼版本5.7.22
歡迎關注我的《深入理解MySQL主從原理 32講 》,如下:
如果圖片不能顯示可查看下面鏈接:
https://www.jianshu.com/p/d636215d767f
這個案例是朋友 @peaceful遇到的線上問題,最終線索也是他自己找到的。現象如下:
...
-rw-r----- 1 mysql dba 12827 Oct 11 12:28 mysql-relay-bin.036615
-rw-r----- 1 mysql dba 4908 Oct 11 12:28 mysql-relay-bin.036616
-rw-r----- 1 mysql dba 1188 Oct 11 12:28 mysql-relay-bin.036617
-rw-r----- 1 mysql dba 5823 Oct 11 12:29 mysql-relay-bin.036618
-rw-r----- 1 mysql dba 507 Oct 11 12:29 mysql-relay-bin.036619
-rw-r----- 1 mysql dba 1188 Oct 11 12:29 mysql-relay-bin.036620
-rw-r----- 1 mysql dba 3203 Oct 11 12:29 mysql-relay-bin.036621
-rw-r----- 1 mysql dba 37916 Oct 11 12:30 mysql-relay-bin.036622
-rw-r----- 1 mysql dba 507 Oct 11 12:30 mysql-relay-bin.036623
-rw-r----- 1 mysql dba 1188 Oct 11 12:31 mysql-relay-bin.036624
-rw-r----- 1 mysql dba 4909 Oct 11 12:31 mysql-relay-bin.036625
-rw-r----- 1 mysql dba 1188 Oct 11 12:31 mysql-relay-bin.036626
-rw-r----- 1 mysql dba 507 Oct 11 12:31 mysql-relay-bin.036627
-rw-r----- 1 mysql dba 507 Oct 11 12:32 mysql-relay-bin.036628
-rw-r----- 1 mysql dba 1188 Oct 11 12:32 mysql-relay-bin.036629
-rw-r----- 1 mysql dba 454 Oct 11 12:32 mysql-relay-bin.036630
-rw-r----- 1 mysql dba 6223 Oct 11 12:32 mysql-relay-bin.index
2019-10-11T12:31:26.517309+08:00 61303425 [Note] While initializing dump thread for slave with UUID <eade0d03-ad91-11e7-8559-c81f66be1379>, found a zombie dump thread with the same UUID. Master is killing the zombie dump thread(61303421).
2019-10-11T12:31:26.517489+08:00 61303425 [Note] Start binlog_dump to master_thread_id(61303425) slave_server(19304313), pos(, 4)
2019-10-11T12:31:44.203747+08:00 61303449 [Note] While initializing dump thread for slave with UUID <eade0d03-ad91-11e7-8559-c81f66be1379>, found a zombie dump thread with the same UUID. Master is killing the zombie dump thread(61303425).
2019-10-11T12:31:44.203896+08:00 61303449 [Note] Start binlog_dump to master_thread_id(61303449) slave_server(19304313), pos(, 4)
實際上第一眼看這個案例我也覺得很奇怪,因為很少有人會去設置slave_net_timeout參數,同樣我們也沒有設置過,因此關注較少。但是 @peaceful自己找到了可能出現問題的設置就是當前從庫slave_net_timeout參數設置為10。我就順著這個線索往下分析,我們先來看看slave_net_timeout參數的功能。
當前看來從庫的slave_net_timeout有如下兩個功能:
1、設置IO線程在空閑情況下(沒有Event接收的情況下)的連接超時時間。
這個參數5.7.7過后是60秒,以前是3600秒,修改后需要重啟主從才會生效。
2、如果change master沒有指定MASTER_HEARTBEAT_PERIOD的情況下會設置為slave_net_timeout/2
一般我們配置主從都沒有去指定這個心跳周期,因此就是slave_net_timeout/2,它控制的是如果在主庫沒有Event產生的情況下,多久發送一個心跳Event給從庫的IO線程,用于保持連接。但是一旦我們配置了主從(change master)這個值就定下來了,不會隨著slave_net_timeout參數的更改而更改,我們可以在slave_master_info表中找到相應的設置如下:
mysql> select Heartbeat from slave_master_info \G
*************************** 1. row ***************************
Heartbeat: 30
1 row in set (0.01 sec)
如果我們要更改這個值只能重新 change master才行。
如果滿足下面三個條件,將會出現案例中的故障:
那么這種情況下在主庫心跳Event發送給從庫的IO線程之前,IO線程已經斷開了。斷開后IO線程會進行重連,每次重連將會生成新的relay log,但是這些relay log由于延遲問題不能清理就出現了案例中的情況。
下面是官方文檔中關于這部分說明:
If you are logging master connection information to tables, MASTER_HEARTBEAT_PERIOD can be seen
as the value of the Heartbeat column of the mysql.slave_master_info table.
Setting interval to 0 disables heartbeats altogether. The default value for interval is equal to the
value of slave_net_timeout divided by 2.
Setting @@global.slave_net_timeout to a value less than that of the current heartbeat interval
results in a warning being issued. The effect of issuing RESET SLAVE on the heartbeat interval is to
reset it to the default value.
有了理論基礎就很好了模擬了,但是延遲這一點不太好模擬,因此我模擬的時候關閉了從庫的SQL線程來模擬積壓的情況。
提前配置好主從,查看當前的心跳周期和slave_net_timeout參數如下:
mysql> show variables like '%slave_net_timeout%';
+-------------------+-------+
| Variable_name | Value |
+-------------------+-------+
| slave_net_timeout | 60 |
+-------------------+-------+
1 row in set (0.01 sec)
mysql> select Heartbeat from slave_master_info \G
*************************** 1. row ***************************
Heartbeat: 30
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
stop slave sql_thread;
mysql> set global slave_net_timeout=10;
Query OK, 0 rows affected, 1 warning (0.00 sec)
mysql> show warnings;
+---------+------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Level | Code | Message |
+---------+------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Warning | 1704 | The requested value for the heartbeat period exceeds the value of `slave_net_timeout' seconds. A sensible value for the period should be less than the timeout. |
+---------+------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
可以看到這里實際上已經有一個警告了。
這樣才會讓slave_net_timeout參數生效
mysql> stop slave ;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.01 sec)
mysql> start slave io_thread;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.01 sec)
大概每10秒會生成一個relay log文件如下:
-rw-r----- 1 mysql mysql 500 2019-09-27 23:48:32.655001361 +0800 relay.000142
-rw-r----- 1 mysql mysql 500 2019-09-27 23:48:42.943001355 +0800 relay.000143
-rw-r----- 1 mysql mysql 500 2019-09-27 23:48:53.293001363 +0800 relay.000144
-rw-r----- 1 mysql mysql 500 2019-09-27 23:49:03.502000598 +0800 relay.000145
-rw-r----- 1 mysql mysql 500 2019-09-27 23:49:13.799001357 +0800 relay.000146
-rw-r----- 1 mysql mysql 500 2019-09-27 23:49:24.055001354 +0800 relay.000147
-rw-r----- 1 mysql mysql 500 2019-09-27 23:49:34.280001827 +0800 relay.000148
-rw-r----- 1 mysql mysql 500 2019-09-27 23:49:44.496001365 +0800 relay.000149
-rw-r----- 1 mysql mysql 500 2019-09-27 23:49:54.789001353 +0800 relay.000150
-rw-r----- 1 mysql mysql 500 2019-09-27 23:50:05.485001371 +0800 relay.000151
-rw-r----- 1 mysql mysql 500 2019-09-27 23:50:15.910001430 +0800 relay.000152
大概每10秒主庫的日志會輸出如下日志:
2019-10-08T02:27:24.996827+08:00 217 [Note] While initializing dump thread for slave with UUID <010fde77-2075-11e9-ba07-5254009862c0>, found a zombie dump thread with the same UUID. Master is killing the zombie dump thread(216).
2019-10-08T02:27:24.998297+08:00 217 [Note] Start binlog_dump to master_thread_id(217) slave_server(953340), pos(, 4)
2019-10-08T02:27:35.265961+08:00 218 [Note] While initializing dump thread for slave with UUID <010fde77-2075-11e9-ba07-5254009862c0>, found a zombie dump thread with the same UUID. Master is killing the zombie dump thread(217).
2019-10-08T02:27:35.266653+08:00 218 [Note] Start binlog_dump to master_thread_id(218) slave_server(953340), pos(, 4)
2019-10-08T02:27:45.588074+08:00 219 [Note] While initializing dump thread for slave with UUID <010fde77-2075-11e9-ba07-5254009862c0>, found a zombie dump thread with the same UUID. Master is killing the zombie dump thread(218).
2019-10-08T02:27:45.589814+08:00 219 [Note] Start binlog_dump to master_thread_id(219) slave_server(953340), pos(, 4)
2019-10-08T02:27:55.848558+08:00 220 [Note] While initializing dump thread for slave with UUID <010fde77-2075-11e9-ba07-5254009862c0>, found a zombie dump thread with the same UUID. Master is killing the zombie dump thread(219).
2019-10-08T02:27:55.849442+08:00 220 [Note] Start binlog_dump to master_thread_id(220) slave_server(953340), pos(, 4)
這個日志就和案例中的一模一樣了。
知道原因后解決也就很簡單了我們只需設置slave_net_timeout參數為MASTER_HEARTBEAT_PERIOD的2倍就可以了,設置后重啟主從即可。
這里我們將通過簡單的源碼調用分析來看看到底slave_net_timeout參數和MASTER_HEARTBEAT_PERIOD對主從的影響。
從庫IO線程啟動時候會通過參數slave_net_timeout設置超時:
->connect_to_master
-> mysql_options
case MYSQL_OPT_CONNECT_TIMEOUT: //MYSQL_OPT_CONNECT_TIMEOUT
mysql->options.connect_timeout= *(uint*) arg;
break;
而在建立和主庫的連接時候會使用這個值
connect_to_master
->mysql_real_connect
-> get_vio_connect_timeout
timeout_sec= mysql->options.connect_timeout;
因此我們也看到了slave_net_timeout參數只有在IO線程重啟的時候才會生效
在每次使用從庫change master時候會設置這個值如下,默認為slave_net_timeout/2:
->change_master
->change_receive_options
mi->heartbeat_period= min<float>(SLAVE_MAX_HEARTBEAT_PERIOD,
(slave_net_timeout/2.0f));
因此我們看到只有change master才會重新設置這個值,重啟主從是不會重新設置的。
每次IO線程啟動時候會將這個值傳遞給主庫的DUMP線程,方式應該是通過構建語句‘SET @master_heartbeat_period’來完成的。如下:
->handle_slave_io
->get_master_version_and_clock
if (mi->heartbeat_period != 0.0)
{
char llbuf[22];
const char query_format[]= "SET @master_heartbeat_period= %s";
char query[sizeof(query_format) - 2 + sizeof(llbuf)];
主庫啟動DUMP線程的時候會通過搜索的方式找到這個值如下
->Binlog_sender::init
->Binlog_sender::init_heartbeat_period
user_var_entry *entry=
(user_var_entry*) my_hash_search(&m_thd->user_vars, (uchar*) name.str,
name.length);
m_heartbeat_period= entry ? entry->val_int(&null_value) : 0;
這里主要是通過一個超時等待來完成,如下:
->Binlog_sender::wait_new_events
->Binlog_sender::wait_with_heartbeat
set_timespec_nsec(&ts, m_heartbeat_period); //心跳超時
ret= mysql_bin_log.wait_for_update_bin_log(m_thd, &ts);//等待
if (ret != ETIMEDOUT && ret != ETIME) //如果是正常收到則收到信號,說明有新的Event到來,否則如果是超時則發送心跳Event
break; //正常返回0 是超時返回ETIMEDOUT 繼續循環
if (send_heartbeat_event(log_pos)) //發送心跳Event
return 1;
根據UUID進行比對如下:
->kill_zombie_dump_threads
Find_zombie_dump_thread find_zombie_dump_thread(slave_uuid);
THD *tmp= Global_THD_manager::get_instance()->
find_thd(&find_zombie_dump_thread);
if (tmp)
{
/*
Here we do not call kill_one_thread() as
it will be slow because it will iterate through the list
again. We just to do kill the thread ourselves.
*/
if (log_warnings > 1)
{
if (slave_uuid.length())
{
sql_print_information("While initializing dump thread for slave with "
"UUID <%s>, found a zombie dump thread with the "
"same UUID. Master is killing the zombie dump "
"thread(%u).", slave_uuid.c_ptr(),
tmp->thread_id());
}//這里就是本案例中的日志了
.....
這里我們看到了案例中的日志。
最后給出一張來自我《MySQL主從原理32講》第17節中DUMP線程的流程圖如下:
在圖中可以看到心跳Event發送的位置。
作者微信: gp_22389860
免責聲明:本站發布的內容(圖片、視頻和文字)以原創、轉載和分享為主,文章觀點不代表本網站立場,如果涉及侵權請聯系站長郵箱:is@yisu.com進行舉報,并提供相關證據,一經查實,將立刻刪除涉嫌侵權內容。